STANDALONES
VS. SERIES
ysteries
are often conceived as, or at least sold, as a series. When I first
started writing, I didn’t know this. After my first mystery, Circles
of Confusion, was sold to Harper Collins, I was naively surprised when
the publisher offered me a two-book deal. They wanted the main character,
Claire Montrose, to come back and solve another crime. In my mind, the
reader was going to leave the characters I had created behind, where
they would go on living their own lives, which would be back to normal.
The publisher, however, felt Claire should continue to stumble across
bodies, be asked to help solve decades-old crimes, be mysteriously attacked,
etc.
There are
a lot of positives to writing a series. Series mysteries offer a writer
the comfort of some set parameters. The tone of the novel, the narrative
style, and many main characters have already been decided upon in the
first book, although new facets of the old characters may be revealed
as they venture into uncharted territory.
But then
there is the lure of the standalone. After writing my third book in
the Claire Montrose series, I was ready to try my hand at a standalone.
A standalone is often characterized as an author’s “break-out
book” (or at least authors hope it will be). Many standalone books
are thrillers, rather than true mysteries.
The way
I think of the difference between mysteries and thrillers is this: At
the heart of a mystery is the solution to a crime, often why someone
was murdered. At the heart of a thriller is not “Who did it?”
(although that might be one question) but rather whether the main character
will still be alive at the end of the book. By its very nature, it’s
hard to turn a standalone into a series, as many of the main characters
will be dead—or revealed to be traitors—by the time the
last page is turned.
I think
there are some real pros and cons to writing a standalone. What follows
is based on my personal observations, plus gossip with other writers.
How
many books will the publisher make an offer for?
When a publisher buys a series mystery, they will almost always offer
a two-book deal. Standalones are more often bought as singletons. However,
the advance for a standalone may be higher.
Will
your book come out in paperback?
Not necessarily a given for the standalone. Anecdotally, I’ve
heard that some houses are cutting back on their paperbacks. With a
series mystery, the publisher has a greater stake in seeing that the
first book comes out as a paperback as a way to drive sales for the
new hardback in the series.
Will
your books stay in print?
There might be more commitment to keeping your backlist going for a
continuing series. A stand alone will live or die on its own terms,
with only a certain amount of cross-over from readers of your series
books.
Will
a television or a movie studio be interested?
There’s only the slightest chance that your book will make it
onto the big or small screen. From what I’ve observed, movie studios
are most interested in standalones, or occasionally the first in a series.
But when it comes to the second, third, fourth, etc. in a series, then
there will likely be little movie interest. However, series are occasionally
optioned for TV. If a TV series were to be made based on the characters
in your series and if it were to air for five years, then it could be
syndicated. That’s a lot of ifs, but my understanding is that
in the long run, residual payments for a series turned TV show can far
outweigh what an author might get even for a book turned movie.
With my
first series book, Circles of Confusion, I
got quite a few movie nibbles. My favorite was a producer working with
Drew Barrymore. When I questioned the idea (Drew is a good 15 years
younger than Claire Montrose), the producer’s voice turned huffy.
“Drew,” she said, “has emotional baggage that makes
her older than her years.” Very true. Drew still passed. The subsequent
books in the series have not attracted any movie interest.
With my
standalone, Learning to Fly, there has been
a great deal of interest, beginning with book scouts before the book
was even in manuscript form.
Should
you write under a pseudonym?
If you are already published as a series mystery author, there may be
a couple of good reasons to write under a different name. You carry
all your old baggage—good and bad—with your new book written
under your same old name. If your series hasn’t been widely reviewed,
or has been pigeonholed (cozies for old ladies who like tea and cats),
or has had poor sales, then these things can affect how your new and
different book is received.
If the
tone of your standalone is quite a bit different than your series novels,
readers who are expecting a PG-rated romp might be very surprised when
they pick up your gritty R-rated serial killer thriller. And it’s
possible that readers who know you write PG-rated romps and only like
edgier books may never pick up your standalone, even if it has a foil-embossed
blood-stained knife on the cover.
Another
reason to consider writing under a pseudonym is marketing. A new name
creates the opportunity for the publisher to promote a brand new author
to bookstores. You won’t be a slave to the chain store computers
that know exactly how many your last book sold and order only that many
or fewer.
All things
considered, when I compare writing the standalone with writing a series,
I’ve decided that at a minimum, I will now alternate standalones
with my series books. It’s a wonderful way to stretch my wings—just
like I did with Learning to Fly.
return
to top
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~