home > fun stuff > interview
with James Lee Burke
1999
INTERVIEW WITH JAMES LEE BURKE
shortly
after the publication of Sunset Limited,
for the literary magazine BOSWELL
Burke: My wife and I do the tour one to two months every year.
We’ve been doing it for many years.
Henry:
You’ve said going on tour puts you behind, and it must
be tiring. If your books sell so well, why still go on tour?
Burke:
There were so many years when I couldn’t have gotten
a tour at gunpoint. My editor is Patricia McCulhaey. And I call her
St. Pat. She and I have been a team for years.
Henry:
So you’ve never switched publishers?
Burke:
Oh, yes. She and I have been to three houses together. We’re
kind of like Siamese twins. She’s almost like a member of our
family. She’s vice-president of Doubleday now, but she became
interested in my work early on, and almost quit the house where she
was working because they wouldn’t give her the money to buy one
of my earlier books. And I hadn’t met her, but I never forgot
the story or the name. And when I had a chance to go with Pat, I told
the agent, that’s the lady. My agent and I are in our 21st year.
When you find the right people, you never let go. The people who count
are the ones who are your friends in lean times. You have all the friends
you want when things are going well.
Henry:
Why do you drive on your tours instead of flying?
Burke:
I don’t like it. I don’t mind, but the people around
me do when I insist on taking over the controls. I can’t tell
you I don’t like being in small spaces. I don’t do things
I don’t like any more. See, I’m 61. That’s one of
the great advantages of age. You can say, I don’t want to, I don’t
care, you can throw temper tantrums, and nobody minds.
Henry:
It’s your version of that poem, “When I am an old
woman I shall wear purple.”
Burke:
You can claim early Alzheimer’s, throw food, whatever
you want to do.
Henry:
Since you live in New Iberia and set one mystery series in
New Iberia, does anyone ever say, oh, this character must be this real
person? Do they draw parallels?
Burke:
I’ve never heard anyone make the biographical comparison,
in part because even a writer may seek to replicate a living person,
the character changes. Second, New Iberia is a very civil place, and
the protocol there has always been, always, going back before the war
between the states, one of very strict and unswerving deference about
privacy, respect for the individual, never imposing on someone else.
Decorum has always been very much a part of daily life there. You don’t
address people by their first name, unless you’ve known them a
very long time. That’s considered very rude. You never blow your
automobile horn. You always address people as Sir and Ma’am and
Miss. You never use profanity in public. You’ll never hear God’s
name used profanely, never, I mean among criminals, no one.
Henry:
You
spend the other half of the year in Montana. Here’s a good high
school essay question for you: Compare and contrast Montana and New
Iberia.
Burke:
They’re
very much alike. Blue collar cultures that are in a state of transition.
In many ways the cultures there, the historical or traditional cultures
are dying. They’re both working class. The value system has to
do with the family, loyalty, friends. Both areas are provincial in a
very good way. They love what they have and they don’t like it
changed. But it’s being undone. It’s just the nature of
history. All things change. The old way of life is disappearing quite
rapidly. The other similarity is a negative one. The assault upon the
environment in both areas. What makes those areas so desirable is the
lack of regulation, the lack of government, a feeling that each person
is free to do their own thing. There is a laize faire attitude about
behavior. Any eccentricity is tolerated. But, you see, if you allow
corporations to work in that same ethos, you’ve got a problem.
Because they come in with baseball bats. They are extractive industries.
Henry:
What
drew you to Montana?
Burke:
By
chance I was offered a chance there teaching at the University of Montana
in 1966.
Henry:
Back
before you were published?
Burke:
No,
I’ve been writing since, oh Lordy. I published my first story
in ‘56. Wrote my first published novel ... wrote Half of Paradise,
my first published book, when I was 23. It all started when I was about
20, and I finished it when I was 23. I taught in Montana for three years.
It’s a great place to live, a tough place to make a living. I
always wrote more easily than I published. It was hard to get my first
book in print. I finished it when I was 23. It took five years before
it came out and then I wrote two more that I didn’t publish. Then
the next one I wrote came out with Scribners, and then I published with
Thomas Crowne and I thought I was home free. The Lost Get Back Boogie
was my next book and it wasn’t published until (whistles) fifteen
years later. I take that back, I finished in 75 and it finally was published
in 86. I didn’t publish in hardback for 13 years in the middle
of my career.
Henry:
Was
it hard to believe in yourself during that long period?
Burke:
It
was discouraging but I never stopped. I never stopped believing in the
work. But it was very discouraging. It’s true that you discover
that what seems to be a failure is part of something larger. Every rejection
is incremental payment on your dues that in some way will be translated
back into your work. Always. I believe the larger story is already written.
It’s just a matter of discovering it. I didn’t see it of
course, and I wrote all those books that were rejected, all those short
stories, gee whiz, and they really got rejected, slammed back with a
catapult. But then a person’s time comes round, is what happens.
But success is a fickle companion, it comes and goes, I’ve learned
that. If it goes away, the success that I’ve enjoyed has been
way beyond my greatest expectations so I’ve nothing to complain
about.
Henry:
I
was struck in Sunset Limited, when you’re talking about
movie people, and you write, “Their attitudes were those of people
who use geographical areas and social cultures as playgrounds and nothing
more.” I detected an authorial voice in that passage. Is that
something you see, especially in Montana, where every movie star on
the planet seems to have a spread there.
Burke:
A River Runs Through It. That did it. Big time. (Laughs.) Half of Santa
Barbara arrived on the next flight after the premiere. Again, it’s
in the nature of things. Places change. Looking at the phenomenon through
the eyes of Dave Robicheaux, who sees his area as an idyllic one that
is flawed both from intrusions coming from the outside, venal, meretricious
interests, the extractive industries, the dope pushers, the Mob, they’re
all there, they’ve done enormous damage there. Dope—crack
cocaine has just devastated working class black and white families.
It has wiped out whole neighborhoods where people of color live frightened
all the time. I was working on our new house with some black men, working
with them on the job, six black fellows, there are old time blue collar
working men, and they were telling me they don’t like going home
at night. They don’t like to go back to neighborhoods full of
crack, and they all had the same fear, it’s for their children.
That their children will be addicted or harmed. I mean, people are killed
in drive-bys, and these men are illiterate, they’re French-speaking,
and they’re having to deal with an environment created for them
that has no equivalent in the world except maybe in Yugoslavia or Beirut,
it’s that bad.
Henry:
In
Portland, the people who do drive-bys are all kids. We’ve had
drive-bys on bicycles. Over puppies.
Burke:
Over
nothing. But the life is gone. And the shooter has no clue what he’s
just done. No emotional concept that he’s just taken—robbed
someone of a life, destroyed a family.
Henry:
That’s why it’s the children who do these things. They don’t
understand.
Burke:
If you put somebody on a crack pipe and give them a 9 mm Baretta, you
don’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure out what’s
going to happen next.
Henry:
Cimmaron
Rose was set in Texas. How is Texas different in terms of a Southern
place, compared to Louisiana.
Burke:
It’s
far more southwestern. You see, even the English that’s spoken
changes dramatically. When you hit East Texas, what is called plantation
English, that characterizes most Southern dialects, ends, and you encounter
another dialect called Southern Midlands in Texas. Because Texas’
ante-bellum economy was not based on the plantation system. The plantation
system made use of English or British tutors. This is where the Southern
accent comes from. They drop their r’s, the hard a sound. People
will often ask me if I’m from Australia. Listen closely and you
hear cockney British. People of color often learned English from 17th
and 18th century slave masters who were English. That’s how plantation
English evolved. In fact Dixie might be a black corruption of the word
Dixon, for Mason-Dixon. Actually what we call black English is really
part of the same dialect spoken by Southern whites. It’s plantation
English. But when you hit East Texas you get into another dialect. Midlands
English is the original American English. It was spoken in Pennsylvania.
Southern Midlands—you hear it spoken in Southern Kansas, Oklahoma,
and Texas.
Henry:
What do people in Oregon speak?
Burke:
You speak a little bit of all of it, I think. Oregon is a great
melting pot.
Henry:
Whenever
I hear broadcasters on the national news, they all sound like—us.
Burke:
Oregon
is a great state. When you enter the state you are just impressed by
the intelligence at work in everything. You know, the Wobblies were
here, the greatest force for social justice in the history of the country.
Henry:
I
know that you went to parochial schools, and I’ve read one critic
who feels there is a spiritual theme underlying all your work—would
you agree with that?
Burke:
That
would be like the author canonizing his own work. The themes all have
to do with redemption. That theme runs throughout Western literature.
It’s the search for the holy grail. it’s the oldest theme
in Western writing. It actually antedates Christ. The search for the
grail goes back probably to a Celtic legend about the hunters, and it
was an explanation of the sound of thunder among the Celts. They believed
thunder was huntsmen pursuing a wild boar or something. But it had to
do again with quests. And that Celtic legend, I guess by the sixth century,
during the time of Arthur, became associated with the grail. The quest
for the grail that you find in early medieval British literature is
the same quest you find in Jack Keroac’s On the Road.
The story is always the same; the characters change. Man’s epic
story, going back to Odysseus, is about the search for a mystical home.
Henry:
I’ve
heard that there are only two plots: someone goes on a journey or a
stranger comes to town.
Burke:
Yeah.
That’s probably it. The stranger is often death. It’s The
Iceman Cometh. It’s the Seventh Seal.
Henry:
Of your four children...
Burke:
One’s
an educational psychologist, one’s a TV ad producer, and two are
prosecutors. One’s a prosecutor right here in Portland. Alafair.
She’s assistant district attorney.
Henry:
Alafair—I
wanted to ask you about her. Why did you name a major character after
your daughter?
Burke:
She’s
based pretty closely on our daughter.
Henry:
Your
daughter’s adopted from El Salvador like the girl in the books?
Burke:
No,
she’s our natural child but all her experiences, her growing up,
paralleled.
Henry:
How
does the real Alafair feel about the fictional Alafair?
Burke:
I
think she likes it okay. It’s a great name, sounds more like a
grandma’s name. It’s an old-timey Texas name. I suspect
it’s English.
Henry:
Dave
Robicheaux is a recovered alcoholic. I understood you are also?
Burke:
Twelve step program, I had 21 years in June.
Henry:
Having
had both the experience of drinking and the experience of stopping,
how do you think it affected you as a writer?
Burke:
I
think Neruda said it better than I. He said, ‘Alcohol appears
to open doors for a poet. However, the poet soon discovers he has wed
himself with an obsession that first will consume his art and then his
life.’ That’s what it comes down to. Every artist knows
it’s a way of mortgaging tomorrow for today. Say you work at another
job, that’s really exhausting, you do lots of things when you’re
tired, well, you can’t write well when you’re tired. A writer
comes home and takes a few drinks, and he feels relaxed, and it seems
to sail for you, and you didn’t think you’d get anything
done at all. Of course what you lose is form. And you look at it the
next day and you realize this wasn’t near as good as I thought
it was. And you’ve also mortgaged the following day. After a while
it consumes a person’s art. I think what happens also is that
a dark view will come into the person’s art, cynicism. The Id
will have its way. We’re just talking about the influence it will
have on the person’s work. We’re not even talking about
the deleterious affect it’s having in other areas.
Henry:
Dave
Robicheaux is a Vietnam vet, but you’re not, right?
Burke:
No,
I’m not. To me the books are more about Central America. I was
in Amnesty International for nine years, then I was chairman of our
chapter for a year. I heard stories about stuff that was going on in
El Salvador or Guatamala. Believe it or not, this is a fact, in 1981
at an AI meeting, this guy, an Iranian, a member of the royalty who
had gone into exile after the revolution, told me all the Iranians in
Paris will tell you that Ronald Regan cut a deal with the Israelis and
with the Iranians to prevent the hostages from being released. That
the Iranian army and the Ayatollah were being aided by the Regan administration
through Israel. I thought it was the wildest story I had ever heard
in my life. The Israelis are sending American arms to the Ayatollah?
The guy told me that in 1981. Then I started hearing other stuff through
Amnesty about what was going on in Central America. That’s how
I began The Neon Rain. Dave Robicheaux’s a Vietnam veteran,
but what he’s drawn into is not Vietnam, but instead Central America.
However, he sees the similarities. Probably the greatest political scandal
in American history is the association between the CIA and opium growers
and illegal arms. It goes all the way back the Golden Triangle. The
pattern repeated itself in Central America. The Contras, no matter what
people say today, were introducing cocaine into the United States. I
heard the head of the DEA during the Regan administration, he said on
public record, on tape, this is an exact quote, “The Contras are
introducing cocaine into the United States.” And they were funding
arms purchases with this stuff. The guy in Panama, what’s his
name? - Crater Face?
Henry:
Noriega?
Burke:
Noriega
worked for the CIA. The president, George Bush, was director of the
CIA. George Bush denied even knowing the guy until someone produced
a photograph of the two of them sitting on the divan together. Dave
sees the parallels. He doesn’t see one instance of new colonialism
as being exception, but instead the continuation of an era.
return
to top
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~